Tutorial Design and Implementation of a Magnetic Levitation Controller using Sliding Mode Control Method
7:56 AM
Edit
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
Magnetic levitation, maglev or magnetic suspension can be defined as the process of suspending
an object in free space against the force of gravity using a magnetic field. Currently magnetic levitation
have been widely applied in various fields that are beneficial to
humans, including: magnetic levitation transportation
[1], biomedical tools
[2], micro robots
[3], wind turbines
[4], bearingless motors
[5] [6] . In general, the maglev systems
are widely applied in various
fields due to the maglev have advantages, including no friction generated
maglev system, faster
and have a high efficiency.
Research about
maglev system is very interesting because the system has been implemented with
the goal to help human . In this
research study about simulations and implementation of the maglev system using conventional
sliding mode control and global sliding mode control. The method sliding mode
control has advantages, including have robustness from disturbances and
parameter uncertainties. SMC method was first discovered in the early 1960s by
Emel'yanov and Barbashin in Russia .
However , the implementation of the maglev system is not easy because the
maglev system is a nonlinear system and the SMC method has the chattering
phenomenon . So, we need a deep analysis related to the maglev system dynamics.
The difference between the dynamics of plant design and control is usually
always the case , this can be caused by disturbance and uncertainty . Analysis the
stability of conventional control sliding mode control and global sliding mode
control are needed. Stability analysis the maglev system using Lyapunov theorem.
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
Maglev system is interest
many researchers topic. Previous studies that evaluated the many associated
with the control methods used in maglev system. There are researching maglev
control using linear control such as root locus of control, Linear Quadratic
Regulator (LQR), PID, and others. Furthermore, several studies using nonlinear
control such as adaptive backstepping
[7], passivity-based control [8], gain scheduling [9], high-gain observers [10]
and sliding mode control [11].
Appropriate controller is required for the maglev system in order to produce good performance . It is known the maglev system having nonlinear dynamics so that nonlinear control is precise control for maglev system . In this studies using sliding mode control method . Previous research related sliding mode control method investigated by Yousfi Khemissi [12]. First, Yousfi analyzing mathematical models of electromagnetic and electric maglev system . Furthermore, designing a sliding mode control method using Matlab Simulink and then simulate. In the simulation performance of sliding mode control is quite good control while following the trajectory with a variety of shapes references and can muffle signal interference . Further research conducted by Jing Chung Shen [13] . In research comparing , control , SMC and PID . The first step , analyzing the maglev system dynamics equations . Then design a , control , SMC and PID . Having successfully designed controls , comparing the performance of the control based on the simulation results . PID control performance is good enough distractions while muffled . However , the performance of the SMC control and are better while following a set point position of the object rather than PID control . Later research conducted by Al - Muthairi and M. Zribi [11] . First , analyzing the mathematical model of a maglev system using the Euler-Newton method known as Newtonian . Once the model is established, the design of static sliding mode control, dynamic sliding mode control and dynamic modified sliding mode control. The results of the research is a position response to the set point of the object obtained by simulations. Based on the simulation results, chattering phenomenon on static sliding mode control has great control while dynamic sliding mode control and sliding mode modified dynamic damping control chattering so that the system becomes more stable. Full modified dynamic sliding mode control has the best performance when compared with the others . Based on several previous studies related to the control of a maglev using sliding mode control method is only a simulation so it has not been proven in the real implementation , because in fact many factors that make control of sliding mode control is unstable due to the effects of chattering , inaccurate and not ideal electronic systems and disruption from the surrounding environment .
Appropriate controller is required for the maglev system in order to produce good performance . It is known the maglev system having nonlinear dynamics so that nonlinear control is precise control for maglev system . In this studies using sliding mode control method . Previous research related sliding mode control method investigated by Yousfi Khemissi [12]. First, Yousfi analyzing mathematical models of electromagnetic and electric maglev system . Furthermore, designing a sliding mode control method using Matlab Simulink and then simulate. In the simulation performance of sliding mode control is quite good control while following the trajectory with a variety of shapes references and can muffle signal interference . Further research conducted by Jing Chung Shen [13] . In research comparing , control , SMC and PID . The first step , analyzing the maglev system dynamics equations . Then design a , control , SMC and PID . Having successfully designed controls , comparing the performance of the control based on the simulation results . PID control performance is good enough distractions while muffled . However , the performance of the SMC control and are better while following a set point position of the object rather than PID control . Later research conducted by Al - Muthairi and M. Zribi [11] . First , analyzing the mathematical model of a maglev system using the Euler-Newton method known as Newtonian . Once the model is established, the design of static sliding mode control, dynamic sliding mode control and dynamic modified sliding mode control. The results of the research is a position response to the set point of the object obtained by simulations. Based on the simulation results, chattering phenomenon on static sliding mode control has great control while dynamic sliding mode control and sliding mode modified dynamic damping control chattering so that the system becomes more stable. Full modified dynamic sliding mode control has the best performance when compared with the others . Based on several previous studies related to the control of a maglev using sliding mode control method is only a simulation so it has not been proven in the real implementation , because in fact many factors that make control of sliding mode control is unstable due to the effects of chattering , inaccurate and not ideal electronic systems and disruption from the surrounding environment .
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHOD
A.
Mathematical Model of Maglev System
The Lagrangian will be presented to
find the mathematical model of a magnetic levitation system. Lagrange equations of motion can be written
as We now define L=T-V; L is called the Lagrangian, T is kinetic energy and V is potential energy.
The approximation coil inductance can be written as
Thus, from general form of Lagrangian equation can be written as
Then, we can get state space model of a magnetic levitation system
In the new coordinates, we can get
differentiating new coordinates equation, then substituting into n3 dot
The
function
f(n) and g(n)
correspondent in the original coordinates
A.
Conventional
Sliding Mode Control
The first step is design the switching
surface. The sliding surface is defined as
substituting n1, n2, and n3 into sliding surface equation
Then design the equivalent control to maintain the system state trajectory
and we get equivalent control
Finally, we can get the conventional SMC controller
We ensure the stability of our system using Lyapunov stability.
CHAPTER IV
DESIGN MAGNETIC LEVITATION
A. Electronic Device
B. Mechanical Device
Schematic design using OrCAD
Double layer layout for PCB
Electronic device
CHAPTER IV
RESULTS
Complete results
can be seen on the web
http://www.mevjournal.com/index.php/mev/article/view/180/design-and-implementation-of-a-magnetic-levitation-system-controller-using- global-sliding-mode-control